.

Belmont City Council Denies CSUS Application

Councilmember Christine Wozniak: "This is the most controversial issue I've had in my five years on Council."

In a 3-2 vote, Belmont City Council denied the application of Crystal Springs Uplands School (CSUS) to build a middle school campus on Davis Drive Tuesday night.

"We are very disappointed in the City Council's decision, but would like to thank the Belmont community for its overwhelming support of our school," said a representative of CSUS.

The singular motion that brought the project to an abrupt halt centered around the General Plan Amendment, which would have allowed the city to rezone the Davis Drive office park property that is currently designated as industrial, to commercial to accommodate the school campus.

Councilmembers Warden, Wozniak and Feierbach voted "yes" on the motion to deny the application; Councilmembers Leiberman and Braunstein voted "no" on the motion.

"We need more commercial property in our community, not more schools," said Councilmember Christine Wozniak.

The motion was made by Feierbach after more than two hours of discussion and public comment. Approximately 15 members addressed the council; most were in favor of the project.

Wozniak said that changing the city's General Plan to allow for the school to take the place of the former commercial buildings would make it easier to change again.

"I don't believe in changing the General Plan for one applicant, because when we make that change, we are changing the vision for our community," said Wozniak.

Mayor Dave Warden was also against changing the General Plan, but said he struggled with his decision.

"I want to do the right thing, but there's no right answer here. It's a land use issue, it's a planning issue. I have to draw on my knowledge of the community, and this comes down to putting a middle school in the middle of a business park," said Warden.

After nearly two-and-a-half hours of discussion and public comment  Councilmember Feierbach made a motion.

"I move that we direct staff to prepare a resolution to deny the application for a General Plan amendment," said Feierbach, which essentially made any discussion of the other four project entitlements moot since the rezoning of the property was the cornerstone of the entire application.

Feierbach read from a prepared statement prior to making the motion, in which she outlined her reasoning for not supporting the application. Her reasons included loss of tax revenue and increased traffic on Ralston Avenue.

"I was enthusiastic about the project in the beginning, but then started looking at all of these other things," said Feierbach.

She added that the mailers sent out by CSUS and the discussions that took place on Belmont Patch also turned her away from the project.

"I couldn't recover from it," she said.

Councilmembers Warren Lieberman and David Braunstein each said they still had some reservations about the project, but were open to further discussion.

Lieberman said he thought the General Plan Amendment should be considered in close alignment with the project's Development Agreement, which outlines the legal and monetary aspects of the application. Part of the Development Agreement included a one time payment of $1 million to the city, and $250,000 per year to offset the loss of property taxes.

"The positive incremental revenue that would be generated from CSUS would allow us to take on projects we might not otherwise be able to do, such as turf the Belmont Sports Complex," said Lieberman.

And David Braunstein stressed the weight of the issue on council.

"You have no idea how seriously we take this issue and how many hours we've put into it. Your input is not lost on us," Braunstein said to the audience and the applicant.

"At the end of the day, I can see where it would make sense to allow CSUS to come to Belmont. With businesses on Davis Drive and CSUS, we can get into a win-win situation," added Braunstein.

Mayor Dave Warden said he had received more than 350 emails and dozens of phone calls about the project.

"At the end of the day, both sides have compelling reasons for being for or against the project. And I've tried to weigh them, but I have to justify my decision, and it is my decision. This has been a torturous process for me," said Warden.

Ron November 16, 2012 at 06:53 PM
Greg, for sure they are inept. However I think this goes deeper. I think the council members who voted against the project are just narcissists who think the only opinion that matters are their own. They don't really care for any input unless it reflects their own opinions. What else can explain the crybaby council member who pouted like a spoiled baby when others expressed views different from hers? And the effrontery she displayed that CSUS would actually advocate on their own behalf!
Concerned Belmont Taxpayer November 16, 2012 at 07:31 PM
Ron, well said. They are small-minded, NIMBYs, who masquerade as Democratic progressives. Absolutely, they could care less how their constituency feels. King David and Queen Coraline need to be shown the door. They are out of touch with reality. It is up to the young families in Belmont, who care about education, to vote them out next November 2013. They are ruining Belmont.
Justin November 16, 2012 at 07:51 PM
You folks are being a bit dramatic. It wasn't a "debacle" at all. It was a decision. Just like in our recent election, some people are happy and some aren't. I truly hope all you whiners WILL run for council. San Mateo has a lot more propery that is more appropriate. Probably near Bay Meadows. Keep in mind Hillsborough (where CSUS) wouldn't allow expansion, and neither did we. It had nothing to do with being for or against education. And it's not the demise of anything, and people who opposed this are not NIMBYS! Grow up!
Ron November 16, 2012 at 07:57 PM
It was a decision made on emotion, and not on facts or what would benefit Belmont. The city lost a great deal of revenue. Next time the city asks for a revenue measure or increases fees because they don't have the money, I'm sure you won't mind if I pass the increase to you, okay?
Concerned Belmont Taxpayer November 16, 2012 at 08:33 PM
Justin, you can not run a city on a no-growth at any cost agenda. Belmont is dying. Just drive around El Camino and Ralston and you will see empty buildings. The Belmont City Council has a strong track record of being anti-education and anti-child during the past 12 years. Just look at their NIMBY voting record. Now due to the City of Belmont's incompetence San Mateo will have a nationally recognized middle school. Also, please update us on the status of Davis Drive. Has it been purchased yet? Or is it the property tax that Cengage owes on Davis Drive being adjusted downwards by $6,000,000, which will mean less money for the BRSSD? Please answer the questions. I would bet the current year taxes reflect the write down so the community (schools, city and fire etc) will all be getting about 30% less than last year. Maybe you want to personally fund the difference.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »