Correction: The San Mateo County Sheriff's has issued a statement indicating that Forrest was not booked into jail, but is being questioned by the U.S. Postal Inspector Service.
KTVU.com is reporting that the chief probation officer for San Mateo County is reportedly under investigation for possessing child pornography.
According to the San Mateo Daily Journal, Stuart Forrest was booked into the San Mateo County Jail, and placed on administrative leave Friday.
Forrest is being questioned by federal law enforcement officials.
The reason I ask is in the SMDJ original article it mentioned a Flash Warrant which allow for a 10 hold without bail. That is something I hadn't heard of before so it caught my attention, it is also missing from their article now, still looking for answers, if that were true it's possible he is in our jail without being booked, maybe that is the question for the Sheriff...Is he in our jail? never mind has he been booked.
"Correction: The San Mateo County Sheriff's has issued a statement indicating that Forrest was not booked into jail, but is being questioned by the U.S. Postal Inspector Service."
I'm curious regarding your statement that you know people who have this issue. I don't think I've ever known a pedophile before. I'm sure it's possible somebody I've known has secretly been one, but I've never actually been aware of pedophilia being anywhere near me.
http://conservativebyte.com/2012/10/fact-checkers-try-to-deny-obama-apology-tour/
Where is he being interviewed? For those of you with a short memory, we just recently had a court case involving San Mateo County's favorite Dr. who was accused of molesting boys from Hillcrest and other sources for many years. So here is what we have in common James P. Fox, William H. Ayres and Stuart Forrest all worked at the Juvenile facilities.
Please do your homework on this issue.
http://en.boywiki.org/wiki/Azov_Films_Prosecutions
Judge Marta Diaz was very good pals with Robert Forrest and recommended that he get the Chief Probation job. According to San Mateo DA Steve Wagstaffe, Diaz and Ayres were also very good pals, and Diaz would have Ayres over to her house for dinner. She also sent boys to him when she was a prosecutor in the DA's office. According to Wagstaffe, Diaz actively tried to intervene into the police investigation into Ayres in 2002 and warned them to be "real careful because Ayres and I are friends." She then continued to send boys to him for another 15 months. She's the only juvenile judge who sent boys to Ayres who has not publicly apologized for doing so.. It is alarming that both the chief probation officer who worked at Hillcrest juvenile hall for decades and the chief evaluating child psychiatrist for juveniles for four decades at Hillcrest are in trouble for child porn and child molestation, respectively. Did Forrest take photos of boys at juvenile hall? Did Ayres and Forrest exchange information about boys? What's going on here?
Take a look at this "Juvenile Justice Coordinating Committee" and look who was on it. Then San Mateo DA Jim Fox, Judge Marta Diaz, Stuart Forrest and Gerry Hilliard, head of the juvenile division of the San Mateo Private Defenders who defended Ayres to the press while Ayres was being investigated and has refused to comment since Ayres' arrest. Also, former DA Jim Fox started out as a counselor at Hillcrest. The earliest known victim of Ayres was a juvenile, molested in 1966. His counselor at Hillcrest was Jim Fox. When the victim, who only found out last year that Ayres had been arrested, contacted Jim Fox to let him know he'd been a victim, Fox never responded to his letters or emails. Take a look at this committe: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:F2XSy6X1MQAJ:www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/Attachments/bnc/pdfs/JJCC%2520Meeting%2520Minutes%25203-12-10_final.pdf+%22Stuart+Forrest%22+Mike+Callagy&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgRUeeHZYPcsmGUYiS7w0Zf9PLgxeBVZG183BiZhRhQSXMsPUcqReo_AWBiZsyAi5t6xuMKPXK9D2k7C8f3eH90z3H28UIRKj4hK5-OXbZTsU6JHuD-9LkldZmu_ToZgq9fXQgV&sig=AHIEtbSAoEwjICKxVC4Wn5PnvsxxKIdEyA
http://en.boywiki.org/wiki/Azov_Films_Prosecutions Starting in 2012, some US customers of Azov Films have been arrested and charged with receipt and possession of child pornography: some of the nude visual material has been construed as illegal by US Law Enforcement Officers ("LEO's"), including agents of the United States Postal Inspection Service.